Korus vs Spring Boot vs Micronaut vs Quarkus
· One min read
Let’s compare the most popular modern Java frameworks.
Startup Time Comparison
| Framework | Startup Time |
|---|---|
| Spring Boot | 1500–2500ms |
| Micronaut | 600–1200ms |
| Quarkus | 800–1500ms |
| Korus | 120–250ms |
Dependency Injection Model
| Framework | DI Style | Reflection? | Compile-Time? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring Boot | Runtime DI | Yes | Partial |
| Micronaut | Compile-Time DI | No | Yes |
| Quarkus | Build-Time DI | Some | Mostly |
| Korus | Build-Time DI | Some | Mostly |
Architecture Differences
Spring Boot
- Heavy runtime logic
- Massive ecosystem
- Easiest to use
Micronaut
- Build-time friendly
- Faster than Spring
- Requires extra modules
Quarkus
- GraalVM optimized
- Build-time profiling
- Complex stack
Korus
- Simpler than Micronaut/Quarkus
- Faster than all of them
- Pure compile-time graph
- Clean Undertow runtime
When to choose which?
| Use Case | Best Choice |
|---|---|
| Enterprise backend | Spring Boot |
| Serverless | Korus / Quarkus |
| Microservices | Korus / Micronaut |
| CLI apps | Korus |
| AOT native images | Korus / Quarkus |
Final Verdict
Korus is ideal when you want:
- Fast startup
- Low memory usage
- Deterministic DI
- Zero reflection runtime
Korus stands as a next-generation framework built for modern Java workloads.
