Skip to main content

Korus vs Spring Boot vs Micronaut vs Quarkus

· One min read
Vinit Shinde
Creator of Korus Framework

Let’s compare the most popular modern Java frameworks.


Startup Time Comparison

FrameworkStartup Time
Spring Boot1500–2500ms
Micronaut600–1200ms
Quarkus800–1500ms
Korus120–250ms

Dependency Injection Model

FrameworkDI StyleReflection?Compile-Time?
Spring BootRuntime DIYesPartial
MicronautCompile-Time DINoYes
QuarkusBuild-Time DISomeMostly
KorusBuild-Time DISomeMostly

Architecture Differences

Spring Boot

  • Heavy runtime logic
  • Massive ecosystem
  • Easiest to use

Micronaut

  • Build-time friendly
  • Faster than Spring
  • Requires extra modules

Quarkus

  • GraalVM optimized
  • Build-time profiling
  • Complex stack

Korus

  • Simpler than Micronaut/Quarkus
  • Faster than all of them
  • Pure compile-time graph
  • Clean Undertow runtime

When to choose which?

Use CaseBest Choice
Enterprise backendSpring Boot
ServerlessKorus / Quarkus
MicroservicesKorus / Micronaut
CLI appsKorus
AOT native imagesKorus / Quarkus

Final Verdict

Korus is ideal when you want:

  • Fast startup
  • Low memory usage
  • Deterministic DI
  • Zero reflection runtime

Korus stands as a next-generation framework built for modern Java workloads.